Forums

As a general matter, I'm glad to have found your site because I study best with sample tests. But an unfortunately large amount of the time, the questions are not helpful because they are either ridiculous or wrong (or at least I can't find any justification in the answers given or the cited source). 

Fundamentals 2 is perhaps the worse I've found -

 1. Mortgage value isn't a public record? Really, because it's posted on my county recorder's website, and I get letters pretty much every week from people trying to sell me insurance/refinance/etc. There's no explanation for this answer.

 2. The publicly recorded warranty deed in my county discloses the marital status of the purchaser and seller.  (i.e. John Smith and Mary Smith, a married couple…"). Again no explanation.

 3. Based on what are improvements public record? I've bought four pieces of real estate in the last three years, and that's news to me.

 4. The answer to 4 is just wrong, since it excludes real estate tax records as public, but the explanation (correctly) states that "Real Estate Tax Information Is Typically Public Record".

 6. The explanation does not explain what "technology model based protections" are, and thus the explanations of what each answer is are not necessarily helpful.

 7-10. Have no explanation.

 11. I do not understand the answers. The inconsistent use of a comma makes it impossible to understand what you are trying to convey, and the English doesn't make sense anyway – the user does not convey their wishes with pre-checked box. (they should read something like ""I opt-in to marketing" with a pre-checked box", I assume)

 12-13. (Same question repeats) What does "out of line" mean? Out of line with EU? With industry practice?  And based on your explanation, I think the answer is wrong. You acknowledge that a company must have the shipping address. Which means the "out of line" statement is "the company should give me a choice."  The answer says that it is "out of line" to say "the company should NOT give me a choice." The reverse is true with the social security answer.

 14, 19. Fill in the blanks are ridiculous. 14 one is perhaps the least unclear that I've seen, but 19 makes no sense.

 20, 24. Proofread your capitalization. 

 22, 23, 24. No explanation/explanation cut off. 

25. How are the OECD guidelines not frameworks for later privacy? Why are they taught then? There's no explanation on this one.

Other ridiculous questions I remember from testing yesterday:

- Which historical cultures recognized privacy?

- A series of questions asking what language entities used to recognize privacy, with four choices that effectively say the same thing using different words.

- A whole test where the haven't been removed around the questions (online privacy, I think)

- Question beginning "a company may…" According to whom? Companies have done all those things without violating the law.

- Safe Harbor questions based on a list of words in the principles. But the other choices that are considered "wrong" are pseudonyms for what is "right" (i.e. sharing v. disclosure)

- Many other examples of explanations that are lacking or nonsensical.

But on a positive note, I also did some glossary sections this morning, and aside from some ridiculous fill in the blanks, have no comments.